![]() They wanted to maintain the flexibility for these gig workers and provide them the opportunity to do this work.”ĭespite Monday’s news, this likely won’t be the last we hear on the issue. Jennifer Barrera, president of the California Chamber of Commerce: “Voters knew what they were voting on.22 granted workers some benefits, including a partial health care subsidy under certain conditions, drivers still don’t have access to other workplace benefits, such as minimum wage, sick leave, unemployment benefits and more. ![]() The money paid off, with voters passing Prop. At the time, it was the state’s most expensive ballot measure, only surpassed last year by two sports gambling propositions. Rideshare companies poured more than $224 million into the initiative, according to Ballotpedia. Monday’s ruling upheld the initiative, which exempted rideshare companies from a law that would have required them to classify the estimated 300,000 to 400,000 Californians who provide rides or deliveries as employees. ![]() If this sounds vaguely familiar, you’re probably thinking of Proposition 22 from 2020. Hundreds of thousands of California rideshare drivers finally have clarity on their job classification - but it’s not the outcome their unions were hoping for.Ī California appeals court ruled Monday that drivers can indeed be treated as independent contractors and not employees of Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and other platforms, reports CalMatters’ Grace Gedye. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |